When Jessica Streeter was first appointed as the guardian ad litem for my son, I found her to be kind and considerate, especially during my first experience with family court. She seemed to help establish a co-parenting schedule, which I initially thought was a positive...
Read MoreWhen Jessica Streeter was first appointed as the guardian ad litem for my son, I found her to be kind and considerate, especially during my first experience with family court. She seemed to help establish a co-parenting schedule, which I initially thought was a positive step. However, I later discovered troubling information that shook my trust in her judgment. She was hosting events at a venue owned by the opposing party, and was in regular contact with them and their family throughout the process. This led me to believe that her actions were motivated by a desire to maintain a favorable relationship with the other party, rather than focusing on my son's best interests and safety.
I started to feel that her decisions were influenced by what would benefit her personally, such as hosting her election campaigns and meetings at the venue owned by my son’s father’s family. This experience has deeply affected me, and unfortunately, I have lost my faith—not only in her, but in the family court system as a whole, including the lawyers and judges involved. I truly believed that she had my son's best interests at heart, but it became clear that her priorities lay elsewhere.
This situation is heartbreaking as a mother, especially when I learned that my son was suffering, experiencing neglect and physical harm from his stepmother and father. Despite this, Jessica Streeter failed to properly investigate the circumstances or advocate for my son's well-being. Instead, she seemed to focus on aligning herself with the opposing party for personal gain, rather than ensuring that my son was safe and cared for.
It is with great sadness that I reflect on her candidacy for judge. If she could make decisions about a 3-year-old’s life based on her personal needs and reputation, rather than on the evidence presented, I can’t help but wonder how she would have handled other cases. People’s lives, especially children’s, should never be treated as a means to benefit one’s own career or reputation.
Two years later, my son is still being neglected and abused in his father’s care, yet I am forced to comply with a custody arrangement that Jessica created, which I believe was influenced by her desire to maintain a good relationship with the other party.
Your response to me pointing out how unethical you conducted yourself by calling me a liar is repugnant. I hope that you grow in ethics. Thank you.
Identifies as women-owned 
Restaurants
Hotels
Services
Stores
Lawyers
Health
Things To Do
Churches
Transportation
Walmart