It was a fine store BEFORE my encounter with a worker|vender.
Before I had entered the store, my friend and I had shopped at Marshall’s. Shopping at Marshall's before entering the store, we encountered an issue with a security tag left on an item of underwear....
Read MoreIt was a fine store BEFORE my encounter with a worker|vender.
Before I had entered the store, my friend and I had shopped at Marshall’s. Shopping at Marshall's before entering the store, we encountered an issue with a security tag left on an item of underwear. We did not think much of it after, but we obviously didn’t take it off.
When we entered the store (Sprout), we didn’t buy anything and wanted to check it out ONLY before they closed.
Despite having receipts to verify our purchases (Marshall), the detector went off due to the tag, causing understandable concern.
However, what followed was deeply uncomfortable—a worker following us into another store, taking pictures, and misleadingly DENYING their actions when confronted.
This behavior was not only invasive but also dishonest, exacerbating the discomfort caused by the initial misunderstanding.
Once again, she followed my friend and I into a pet store, assuming we were stealing and subsequently took pictures. I had seen her phone and the snap noise louder once leaving the pet store. She was a vendor there, quote on quote pet stuff for her business. The experience was distressing as it implied mistrust without cause. Despite not having stolen anything, the presumption was uncomfortable and invasive, affecting our overall visit. Such assumptions can be damaging and should be approached with sensitivity and respect for individuals’ privacy and innocence until proven otherwise.
Small business 
Restaurants
Hotels
Services
Stores
Lawyers
Health
Things To Do
Churches
Transportation
Walmart